xerakko ([info]xerakko) wrote,
@ 2006-10-15 11:03:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:debian

Experiment Failed.
Orphaned packages, and maintainers resigning. The dunk tank, as a improved project has FAILED.


(Read 7 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: Why not?
(Anonymous)
2006-10-16 05:20 am UTC (link)
First, it's 'Dunc-Tank', not 'Dunk-Bank'. Second, be careful with your language; a slightly prejudiced interpretation of your words could be that the opponents of the Dunc-Tank are orphaning the packages now *deliberately* to delay Etch. Which is of course not true, as the orphaning and resignations are simply an by-product of the whole situation.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)
Re: Why not?
[info]jmtd
2006-10-16 08:20 am UTC (link)
The "dunc-bank" project he refers to is correct: It is a tongue-in-cheek project founded post dunc-tank with the express task of delaying etch. See http://dunc-bank.zoy.org/

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(Read 7 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…