Someone wrote in ![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} xerakko, |
Re: Why not?
First, it's 'Dunc-Tank', not 'Dunk-Bank'. Second, be careful with your language; a slightly prejudiced interpretation of your words could be that the opponents of the Dunc-Tank are orphaning the packages now *deliberately* to delay Etch. Which is of course not true, as the orphaning and resignations are simply an by-product of the whole situation.
First, it's 'Dunc-Tank', not 'Dunk-Bank'. Second, be careful with your language; a slightly prejudiced interpretation of your words could be that the opponents of the Dunc-Tank are orphaning the packages now *deliberately* to delay Etch. Which is of course not true, as the orphaning and resignations are simply an by-product of the whole situation.
